<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.chinwag.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>trade marks</title>
 <link>http://www.chinwag.com/tags/trade-marks</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Google Adwords trade mark policy change - has the law changed?</title>
 <link>http://www.chinwag.com/blogs/alex-chapman/google-adwords-trade-mark-policy-change-has-law-changed</link>
 <description>&lt;span&gt;So I have just received this: 
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt; 
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;-----Original Message-----
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;From: Google [&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;mailto:trademark-policy-revision@google.com&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;mailto:trademark-policy-revision@google.com&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;] 
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chinwag.com/blogs/alex-chapman/google-adwords-trade-mark-policy-change-has-law-changed&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.chinwag.com/blogs/alex-chapman/google-adwords-trade-mark-policy-change-has-law-changed#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.chinwag.com/tags/adwords">adwords</category>
 <category domain="http://www.chinwag.com/topic/ecommerce">ecommerce</category>
 <category domain="http://www.chinwag.com/tags/law">law</category>
 <category domain="http://www.chinwag.com/tags/trade-marks">trade marks</category>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.chinwag.com/crss/node/32803</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:58:45 +0100</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Alex Chapman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">32803 at http://www.chinwag.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Trade marks are property - treat them that way.</title>
 <link>http://www.chinwag.com/blogs/alex-chapman/trade-marks-are-property-treat-them-way</link>
 <description>I see that Google is getting it in the neck again over trade marks. It seems it can&amp;#39;t win - if it takes action to deal with trade mark infringers it is criticised as being over zealous and if it doesn&amp;#39;t it is seen as being irresponsible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I&amp;#39;m not going to add weight to any side of the argument here but it might help to explain a bit more about what trade marks are and what they do.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chinwag.com/blogs/alex-chapman/trade-marks-are-property-treat-them-way&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.chinwag.com/blogs/alex-chapman/trade-marks-are-property-treat-them-way#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.chinwag.com/topic/marketing">marketing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.chinwag.com/tags/passing">passing off</category>
 <category domain="http://www.chinwag.com/tags/trade-marks">trade marks</category>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.chinwag.com/crss/node/26779</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Alex Chapman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">26779 at http://www.chinwag.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
