<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.chinwag.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>screen resolution</title>
 <link>http://www.chinwag.com/tags/screen-resolution</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Design and screen resolution</title>
 <link>http://www.chinwag.com/blogs/nikki-barton/design-and-screen-resolution</link>
 <description>2007 was the year most agencies and clients really started to think of 1024 pixels and upwards as the primary horizontal screen resolution,  rather than 800.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course the stats have shown that higher screen resolutions have been growing rapidly over the last few years, but until recently many clients still defaulted to the safety of 800 pixels. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chinwag.com/blogs/nikki-barton/design-and-screen-resolution&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.chinwag.com/blogs/nikki-barton/design-and-screen-resolution#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.chinwag.com/topic/design">design</category>
 <category domain="http://www.chinwag.com/tags/screen-resolution">screen resolution</category>
 <category domain="http://www.chinwag.com/tags/usability">usability</category>
 <wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://www.chinwag.com/crss/node/26140</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Nikki Barton</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">26140 at http://www.chinwag.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
