[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Previous in Thread] [Next in Thread]


Subject: UKNM: What if it's all shite? (was .TV)
From: tim.hayward
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 21:50:45 +0100

I'm unendingly amused by the unbelievable stupidity and greed of URL
speculators
but here's a question.

Is there any fundamental technical reason why the whole mess couldn't be
replaced by another metaphor at a keystroke? Let's say for a moment, that a
browser or iTV company wanted to make the whole process simpler and added
their
own layer of nicknames, hotlinks, whatever? Surely the verbal URL itself is
only
a mnemonic.

I can't help feeling that market forces will push us toward a simpler
solution
over time. Have I missed some simple mathematical or logical reason why this
couldn't eventually happen?


Tim


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
looking for useful books about the new media biz?
check out the UKNM books page for some suggestions:
http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing/books.shtml
Email suggestions to: helpatchinwag [dot] com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe or change your list settings go to
http://www.chinwag.com/uk-netmarketing or helpatchinwag [dot] com



Replies
  Re: UKNM: What if it's all shite? (was ., Ben Thompson
  Re: UKNM: What if it's all shite? (was ., Ray Taylor

[Previous] [Next] - [Index] [Thread Index] - [Next in Thread] [Previous in Thread]